THE COMPARISON OF ACCURACY KICKING BY MALAYSIAN ATHLETE IN SILAT 28th 2015 SEA GAMES SINGAPORE
1.0 Abstract
The
purpose of this study to explore the accuracy kicking by Malaysian athlete
from class E of the 65-70 kg weight and
class B of the 50kg to 55kg classification. An observation from video that collected from Youtube to be
analysed with software of Kinovea and Independent sample test from exported the
data to Statistical Package
for Social Scientists, version 21 (SPSS). Result from the table 1.0, 2.0, 3.0,
4.0 will show the result kicking from Malaysian athlete and the opponent to
make the comparison between them.
2.0 Introduction
The need to review the accuracy of this was to determine
the frequency of Malaysian athletes kick in a match. In this shot there are
three sections where the kick right on target, another kick, and kick does not
hit the target. From the data collected will be able to find out whether the
victory is obtained through collection points earned through movement of kicks
or other movements. This data can also be concluded whether the aggressive
level of an athlete is high or not. More opportunities created is likely to produce
a higher chance to get points.
2.0 Material
and methods
Match analysis
An openly accessible
video recording of four men silat coordinate from the Malaysia national silat
competition in Sea Games Singapore 2015 from Youtube was utilized for the
examination. This was a men last match of class E of the 65-70 kg weight and
class B of the 50kg to 55kg classification. Subsequent player movement
examination was done utilizing a business sports execution investigation
programming bundle called Kinovea. The framework was utilized to distinguish 14
distinct sorts of occasion performed by the four men challengers and the begin
and end of activity periods. Video successions were repeated where fundamental
and the playback rate was decreased to 40 % to permit precise estimation of
every hostile and protective development class. The video could be stopped and
played back edge by casing for convenience. Silat example movement was
subjectively classified by an accomplished observational investigator for silat
competition. The frequency, mean duration and percentage of total time were
subsequently calculated.
Motion
categories
Silat example's
movements were coded into 14 distinct sorts of classes and were characterized
as takes after:
Punch:
The punch "tumbuk" assault is finished by a hand with a shut clench
hand hitting the objective. In silat punching is frequently used to battle the
adversary. It can be a straight punch 'tumbuk lurus' or uppercut
"sauk" to the type body's.
Kick:
The kick 'tendang/terajang' is an assaulting development which is performed
with one leg or two legs at the same time. A kick can be gone for any
objective. It can be front kick " tendang depan', side-kick
"depak" or semi-roundabout side kick 'tendang lengkar'.
Block:
The blocking developments start with the stance position 'sikap pasang': the
example stands straight with his hands around his body or hidden from plain
view. Blocking or repelling "tangkisan" should be possible utilizing
arms, elbows and legs with the reason to close off or striking back at any
assault.
Catch:
The catch "tangkapan" is finished by utilizing the hand to deter the
rival from doing an assault. The silat type can keep him from being assaulted
by indicating the assault which he has gotten another heading. A catch which
turns or drags the adversary is taboo.
Topple:
There are different methods for toppling down one's rival. Each fall is viewed
as legitimate the length of the silat example topples his adversary down
without wrestling or he can overwhelm the rival whom he has cut down.
Sweep:
Swiping "sapuan" includes assaulting an adversary's leg which are on
the ground to unstabilise him and convey down to the ground
Evade/Dodge:
The sidestep "elakan" procedure is completed by silat type when he
tries to dodge an assault. This strategy does not require the silat type to
touch the adversary in fighting off the assault.
Self-Release:
Self-discharge 'lepas tangkapan' method is a system to open any secure or catch
from a rival.
Block
and Punch: The blocking procedure is utilized to hinder any
hand or leg assault from the rival and took after by counter assault utilizing
the hand to punch the rival.
Block
and Kick: The blocking method is utilized to hinder any hand
or leg assault from the adversary and took after by counter assault utilizing
the leg to kick the rival.
Block
and Sweep: The blocking strategy is utilized to obstruct any
hand or leg assault from the rival and took after by counter assault utilizing
clearing system to the adversary.
Fake
Punch: An activity which a silat example means to
confound the adversary utilizing a fake punch to break his rival's protective
stance.
Fake
Kick:
An activity which a silat example expects to confound the rival utilizing a
fake kick to break his rival protective stance.
Others:
Both silat examples are either in stance position 'sikap pasang' or approaching
each other utilizing silat step design 'pola langkah'. Every one of the
exercises are viewed as high power aside from others which around then both silat
types are in low force periods.
4.0
Statistical analysis
Observations generated from the frequency data is calculated, the
researchers used the method of recording and observation in a certain time. All
raw data obtained by Kinovea exported into Microsoft Excel and later
transferred to SPSS for further analysis. Statistical analysis was performed
using the Statistical Package for Social Scientists, version 21 (SPSS).
Independent sample test was
used to determine whether a similar profile joint action taken by the red and
blue in the match.
5.0 Results
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
PENCAK SILAT TANDING MEN’S CLASS E SEMI FINAL MAS VS SIN (DAY 8) SINGAPORE SEA
GAMES 2015
ACTION
|
HIT TARGET
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
|||||||
MAS
|
SIN
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
MAS
|
SIN
|
|||||
PUNCH
|
2
|
6
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
||||
KICK
|
15
|
9
|
7
|
6
|
-
|
11
|
||||
BLOCK
|
7
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
SWEEP
|
3
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
1
|
||||
TOPPLE
|
2
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
CATCH
|
3
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
SELF
RELEASE
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
BLOCK
PUNCH
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
BLOCK
KICK
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
BLOCK
SWEEP
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
EVADE
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
FAKE
PUNCH
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
||||
FAKE
KICK
|
2
|
4
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
||||
OTHERS
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||
TOTAL
|
43
|
27
|
11
|
13
|
7
|
14
|
||||
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
MALAYSIA
|
3
|
7.3333
|
7.50555
|
4.33333
|
SINGAPORE
|
3
|
8.6667
|
2.51661
|
1.45297
|
|
Table 1.0
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
PENCAK SILAT TANDING MEN’S CLASS E FINAL MAS VS VIETNAM (DAY 9) SINGAPORE SEA
GAMES 2015
ACTION
|
HIT
TARGET
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
|||
MAS
|
VIET
|
MAS
|
VIET
|
MAS
|
VIET
|
|
PUNCH
|
14
|
10
|
4
|
7
|
2
|
5
|
KICK
|
13
|
18
|
4
|
8
|
2
|
6
|
BLOCK
|
6
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SWEEP
|
14
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
TOPPLE
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
CATCH
|
9
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SELF
RELEASE
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
BLOCK
PUNCH
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
KICK
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
BLOCK
SWEEP
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
EVADE
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
PUNCH
|
3
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
KICK
|
3
|
11
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
OTHERS
|
4
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
TOTAL
|
80
|
61
|
8
|
15
|
4
|
11
|
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
MALAYSIA
|
3
|
6.3333
|
5.85947
|
3.38296
|
VIETNAM
|
3
|
10.6667
|
6.42910
|
3.71184
|
|
Table 2.0
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
PENCAK SILAT TANDING MEN’S CLASS B SEMI FINAL MAS VS VIETNAM (DAY 8) 28TH
SEA GAMES SINGAPORE 2015
ACTION
|
HIT
TARGET
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
|||
MAS
|
VIE
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
MAS
|
VIE
|
|
PUNCH
|
5
|
11
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
2
|
KICK
|
4
|
8
|
-
|
6
|
2
|
5
|
BLOCK
|
3
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SWEEP
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
TOPPLE
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
CATCH
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SELF
RELEASE
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
PUNCH
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
KICK
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
SWEEP
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
EVADE
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
PUNCH
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
KICK
|
2
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
OTHERS
|
2
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
TOTAL
|
26
|
31
|
3
|
12
|
6
|
7
|
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
MALAYSIA
|
3
|
2.0000
|
2.00000
|
1.15470
|
VIETNAM
|
3
|
6.3333
|
1.52753
|
.88192
|
|
Table 3.0
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
PENCAK SILAT TANDING MEN’S CLASS B FINAL MAS VS THAI (DAY 9) 28TH
SEA GAMES SINGAPORE 2015
ACTION
|
HIT
TARGET
|
HIT
ELSEWHERE
|
MISS
OPPONENT
|
|||
MAS
|
THA
|
MAS
|
THA
|
MAS
|
THA
|
|
PUNCH
|
4
|
8
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
KICK
|
7
|
6
|
1
|
4
|
1
|
8
|
BLOCK
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SWEEP
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
TOPPLE
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
CATCH
|
2
|
6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
SELF
RELEASE
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
PUNCH
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
KICK
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
BLOCK
SWEEP
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
EVADE
|
2
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
PUNCH
|
1
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
FAKE
KICK
|
2
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
OTHERS
|
3
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
TOTAL
|
22
|
1
|
1
|
6
|
3
|
9
|
Group
Statistics
|
|||||
Group
|
N
|
Mean
|
Std.
Deviation
|
Std.
Error Mean
|
|
Score
|
MALAYSIA
|
3
|
3.0000
|
3.46410
|
2.00000
|
THAILAND
|
3
|
6.0000
|
2.00000
|
1.15470
|
|
Table 4.0
6.0 Discussion
Table 1.0 shows the kicks performed by two participants who represented Malaysia from the blue corner, while participants from the red corner are represented from Singapore. This kick considered as a whole in three rounds. For this match, the observer has detected kicks performed by the participants of the blue corner kick that was 15 about right on target. Participants of the red corner stood at 9-kick right on target. From this observation, Blue corner is winning by the high accuracy kicking to target rather than red corner that make him get the extra points from the wasit.
Table 2.0 shows the kicks performed by two
participants who represented Malaysia from the blue corner, while participants
from the red corner are represented from Vietnam. This kick considered as a
whole in three rounds. For this match, the observer has detected kicks performed
by the participants of the blue corner kick that was 13 about right on target.
Participants of the red corner stood at 18 kick right on target. From this
observation, the red corner is winning the kicking by high accuracy hit to
target but at the end of the match the blue corner wins the games by other
subject whereas done sweep with high accuracy to target.
Table 3.0 shows the kicks performed by two participants who represented Malaysia from the red corner, while participants from the blue corner are represented from Vietnam. This kick considered as a whole in three rounds. For this match, the observer has detected kicks performed by the participants of the red corner kick that was 4 about right on target. Participants of the blue corner stood at 8 kick right on target. From this observation, Blue corner is winning by the high accuracy kicking to target rather than red corner. But the red corner wins the games cause of the unforced error of the punch on target elsewhere to injure an opponent and victory will be given to the red corner.
Table 4.0 shows the kicks performed by two
participants who represented Malaysia from the red corner, while participants
from the blue corner are represented from Thailand. This kick considered as a
whole in three rounds. For this match, the observer has detected kicks
performed by the participants of the red corner kick that was 7 about right on
target. Participants of the blue corner stood at 6 kick right on target. From
this observation, red corner is winning by the high accuracy kicking to target
rather than blue corner. But the red corner wins the games also cause of the
roughness did by opponent like just happened at the semi-final match by the
punch on target elsewhere to injure an opponent and victory will be given to
the red corner.
7.0 Conclusions
Kicking is the often movement that has been used the athlete with produces of high movement rather than other type of movement. Accuracy kick at goal is not to become a strong factor to win exponents of Malaysia. However, the Malaysian exponents of category E has the precision high kick on target that contributed to his victory in the semi-finals and final are analysed by the researchers. Other than that other of movement of silat has contribute the points. For Malaysian exponents of category B has an accuracy kick on target lower than his opponent, but the victory as a result of a foul opponent. The Malaysian athlete from category B needs to do more trial for kicking with produces low of kicking at target and also low at miss target which make the opportunity to collect point more limited. However, Malaysian athlete from category E is quite good in any movement that make him collect of high point and win the gold medal, his is quite good from sweep striking. The athlete from Malaysia need to more brave to do the striking and need to aware to blocking and evade from opponent attack.
8.0 Recommendation
Malaysian
athlete need more to train from upper body strength due to result that less of
striking from punching.
9.0 Refferences
Angleman, A. J., Shinzato, Y., Van
Hasselt, V. B., & Russo, S. A. (2009). Traditional martial arts versus
modern self-defense training for women: Some comments. Aggression and
Violent Behavior, 14(2), 89-93. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.12.001
Barkadehi, B., & Abedimahzoun, M.
(2015). Pp-052 a comparison of the effects of frequency and intensity of
anaerobic exercises on some physical fitness factors in martial arts athletes. The
American Journal of Cardiology, 115, Supplement 1, S120. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.408
Fong, S. S. M., Fu, S.-n., & Ng, G.
Y. F. (2012). Taekwondo training speeds up the development of balance and
sensory functions in young adolescents. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport,
15(1), 64-68. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.06.001
Fong, S. S. M., & Ng, G. Y. F.
(2011). Does taekwondo training improve physical fitness? Physical Therapy
in Sport, 12(2), 100-106. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.07.001
Fong, S. S. M., & Tsang, W. W. N.
(2012). Relationship between the duration of taekwondo training and lower limb
muscle strength in adolescents. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 30(1),
25-28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2011.11.004
Greenwood, C. (1977). A sport grown out
of a martial art. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 17(1), 74-75.
doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-7368(77)71120-X
Groen, B. E., Weerdesteyn, V., &
Duysens, J. (2007). Martial arts fall techniques decrease the impact forces at
the hip during sideways falling. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(2),
458-462. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.014
James, L. P., Robertson, S., Haff, G.
G., Beckman, E. M., & Kelly, V. G. (2017). Identifying the performance
characteristics of a winning outcome in elite mixed martial arts competition. Journal
of Science and Medicine in Sport, 20(3), 296-301. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.001
Lakes, K. D., & Hoyt, W. T. (2004).
Promoting self-regulation through school-based martial arts training. Journal
of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 283-302. doi:
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2004.04.002
Neto, O. P., Silva, J. H., Marzullo, A.
C. d. M., Bolander, R. P., & Bir, C. A. (2012). The effect of hand
dominance on martial arts strikes. Human Movement Science, 31(4),
824-833. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2011.07.016
Rios, S. O., Marks, J., Estevan, I.,
& Barnett, L. (2017). Health benefits of participation in selected ‘hard’
martial arts for adults: A systematic review. Journal of Science and
Medicine in Sport, 20, Supplement 1, e43. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.01.119
Shapie, M. M., Oliver, J., O’Donoghue,
P., & Tong, R. (2013). Activity profile during action time in national
silat competition. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 4(1), 75-79.
doi:10.5604/20815735.1073630
Terry, C. M. (2006). The martial arts. Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 17(3), 645-676. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2006.05.001
Tolkyn, M., Gulzhan, B., & Raikhan,
S. (2014). Military art in avar khaganate. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 122, 19-23. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1296
Zago, M., Mapelli, A., Shirai, Y. F.,
Ciprandi, D., Lovecchio, N., Galvani, C., et al. (2015). Dynamic balance in
elite karateka. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 25(6),
894-900. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.10.002
S. (2015,
July 20). Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Semi-Final SIN vs MAS (Day 8) |
28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved April 19, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L62CI3MJ-8A&t=251s
S. (2015,
June 14). Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class E Final VIE vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th
SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved April 19, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGK1CSVk0qs
S. (2015,
June 13). Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class B Final THA vs MAS (Day 9) | 28th
SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved April 19, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YsMd2SM4so&t=53s
S. (2015,
June 12). Pencak Silat Tanding Men's Class B Semi-Final MAS vs VIE(Day 8) |
28th SEA Games Singapore 2015. Retrieved April 19, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YsMd2SM4so&t=53s
Comments
Post a Comment